Masskier
New member
They are still on track for a new summit lift this year.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Wasn't a new lift already act250 approved as part of the "master plan" ( http://www.anr.state.vt.us/site/cfm/act250/detail.cfm?ID=25307 )? Or have they now decided to split it off into its own project?
I don't see anything new in the online Act 250 database: http://www.anr.state.vt.us/site/cfm/act250/search.cfm Note: you have to enter search criteria.
That damn lift will be very much appreciated tomorrow when the winds are honking. Thankfully, the Poma will still be there (hopefully in its same length) when the high speeder goes in.Funny... I was thinking on my last run today that hopefully I was taking my last ride on that damn lift. We can hope.
A second lift to the summit, or a replacement for the old chair to the summit?
Indeed. I can't see any good reason to change the Poma in any way. It is great insurance for a high speed lift. We saw what a surface lift can do this past weekend at the AZ Summit. The Loaf would have sucked on Saturday if not for that T-bar. I doubt BMA would be very happy with an altered Poma, either. Especially if they were training or racing on Warren's top to bottom and the HSQ goes down due to wind, a shortened Poma would be terrible for them as well (though a lot of training does only happen on the lower mountain). I have enjoyed powder days at Burke riding the Poma when the Quad was down. It is a great option.Leave the Poma alone IMHO!
Indeed. I can't see any good reason to change the Poma in any way. It is great insurance for a high speed lift. We saw what a surface lift can do this past weekend at the AZ Summit. The Loaf would have sucked on Saturday if not for that T-bar. I doubt BMA would be very happy with an altered Poma, either. Especially if they were training or racing on Warren's top to bottom and the HSQ goes down due to wind, a shortened Poma would be terrible for them as well (though a lot of training does only happen on the lower mountain). I have enjoyed powder days at Burke riding the Poma when the Quad was down. It is a great option.
If they doze MidBurke I hope they can preserve the bar part, one of the best post ski spots I have been at.
A lot of locals will not be happy if they knock down Burkie's Bar. It is in a good location and has a really laid back old school vibe. It is also a good counterpoint to the much more polished Tamarack Bar in that is in the base lodge. If Burke does plan to remove the entire building, there is some mumbling from the locals about actually deconstructing the section that contains the bar and re-erecting it somewhere else (either on or near the mtn).
Mid Burke stays as is. They moved the location of the lift some, so they wouldn't have to take down Mid Burke
Okay then, what changes were made?
Roughly the "Original plan":
Move Right:
Move Left:
I prefer a move to the right since it would be less of a slog from the Willoughby side and it doesn't interfere with as many existing trails. My guess this adjustment would also be behind the new race timing building I've been hearing about since the existing one is in the way of this new line.
You have almost the exact location (middle photo) move right.